AI answer readiness checker
Whether a page is shaped to be quoted in an AI answer. Free and no account. Nothing leaves your browser.
120 words. Nothing is uploaded; the analysis runs here.
Structurally ready to be quoted
These are structural checks. They cannot tell you whether your answer is right or whether an assistant trusts your domain — only whether a passage worth quoting could physically be lifted from this page.
Answers up front — Good
The opening sentence is 4 words and can be lifted whole.
Headings phrased as questions — Good
3 of 3 headings read as a question someone would type.
Scannable blocks — Good
3 list items — discrete, quotable units.
Paragraphs stay liftable — Good
No paragraph runs past 120 words.
Passages stand alone — Good
No backward references that break when a passage is quoted out of context.
Specific enough to cite — Good
5 figures. Concrete numbers are what make one source worth naming over another.
There is no score out of 100 here on purpose. Nobody knows the weighting an assistant applies, and a number would imply a precision these checks do not have. Fix what is listed; ignore anyone selling you a percentage.
What it tells you
Checks the opening claim
Whether a standalone answer exists in the first sentence, which is what extractive answering lifts.
Finds broken references
"As mentioned above" is invisible damage: quoted out of context, the passage points at nothing.
Looks for quotable structure
Question headings, lists and tables are the units an assistant can take whole.
No score out of 100
Nobody knows the weighting, so inventing a percentage would be making it up.
How to use it
- 1Paste the pageMarkdown headings and lists are understood. Nothing is uploaded.
- 2Fix what is listed as red firstBroken back-references and missing headings do the most damage per word changed.
- 3Re-checkThe analysis reruns as you edit, so you can see a rewrite land.
Questions people ask
Will this get me cited by ChatGPT?
No tool can promise that, and this one does not try. Whether an assistant cites you depends mostly on whether your page is the best answer and whether the source is trusted, neither of which is measurable from the text alone. What is measurable is whether a passage worth quoting could physically be lifted from the page. That is a necessary condition, not a sufficient one.
Why is there no score?
Because a number implies a precision these checks do not have. The weighting an assistant applies is not public and changes without notice. A list of specific things to change is honest; "87/100 AI optimised" is a marketing number dressed as a measurement.
What actually makes a passage quotable?
Four properties. It stands alone, with no reference to something earlier on the page. It states the answer directly rather than building to it. It sits under a heading matching the question someone would ask. And it contains something specific, a number or a name, that makes your version worth citing over an identical paraphrase elsewhere.
Is this the same as AEO or GEO?
It is one mechanical piece of it. AEO and GEO as terms cover everything from schema to brand mentions to being quoted on sites the model already trusts. Page structure is the part you fully control and the cheapest to fix, which is why it is worth doing first, but it is not the whole discipline.
Other free tools
Word counter
Words, characters, sentences, paragraphs and reading time, as you type.
Readability checker
Flesch reading ease and grade level, with the sentences dragging you down.
Keyword density analyzer
Which terms you actually used, and how often, including two and three word phrases.
SERP preview
How your title and meta description will truncate in Google, in pixels.
Character counter
Live character count against the limits for every field that has one.
Headline checker
Scores a headline on length, structure and the words that make people click.
Image resizer
Resize and compress an image without it ever leaving your machine.
Permalink generator
A clean, lowercase, ASCII URL slug from any headline.
robots.txt generator
A valid robots.txt, with the AI crawlers listed explicitly.
UTM link builder
Tagged campaign links, with the casing normalised so reports do not split.
Title case converter
AP, Chicago, APA or sentence case, because they genuinely disagree.
Schema markup generator
Valid JSON-LD for FAQ, Article, Product and Organization.
llms.txt generator
The file that tells assistants what your site is and which pages matter.
Meta tag generator
Title, description, canonical and the social tags, in one block.
XML sitemap generator
Paste your URLs, get a valid sitemap.xml.
Hreflang tag generator
Language and region tags that point at each other properly.
301 redirect generator
Old URLs to new ones, as Apache, Nginx or Next.js rules.
Keyword mixer
Combine lists into every permutation, deduplicated.
AI meta description writer
Three descriptions at the right length, from what the page actually covers.
AI FAQ generator
The questions people actually type, with answers short enough to be quoted.
AI keyword intent classifier
What each keyword wants, and the one page type that should target it.
Want a tool like this on your own domain?
This page is the argument for the offer. A small useful utility gets embedded and linked, and every embed is a link back. kiterank builds one for your audience and hosts it on your domain, so the links accrue to you rather than to us.